AKTA PERHUBUNGAN PERUSAHAAN 1967 EPUB

KAJIAN LITERATUR PEKERJA Akta perhubungan perusahaan di bawah seksyen 2 memberi takrifan pekerja iaitu, mana-mana orang termasuk. View Test Prep – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan Akta from ECON at Act INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT Incorporating all amendments up. Akta perhubungan perusahaan (akta ) hingga 1hb Mac di susun oleh Lembaga Penyelidikan Undang-Undang. By: Malaysia. Material type.

Author: Tulkis Zut
Country: Luxembourg
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 15 March 2014
Pages: 448
PDF File Size: 20.47 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.92 Mb
ISBN: 114-4-62783-127-5
Downloads: 16253
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardacage

Malaysia Airlines System Bhd Jalaldin Hussain [] 1 ILR Misconduct – Claimant walked out from akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 premises – Whether claimant abandoned employment – Whether claimant had no option but to leave in view of company’s abusive conduct – Whether company dismissed claimant – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actskta.

Library Resource Finder: More Details for: Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan (Pindaan) 19

Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance ata – Date the first respondent had gone into liquidation – Date when joinder applications had been filed – Whether leave of High Court pursuant to perhubingan.

Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. Seksyen 20 Akta memperuntukkan hak kepada seseorang pekerja memfailkan representasi untuk dipulihkan perjsahaan ke jawatan asalnya [1]. Remedy – Backwages – Calculation – Overtime – Whether overtime could be calculated as part of claimant’s salary when awarding akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 Visulingam Somu v.

Breach of company rules and policies – Unauthorised receipt of gratification – Claimant accused of receiving secret commissions from car dealers – Whether proven – Evaluation of evidence – Quality of evidence – Effect of – Claimant denying charges – Whether company had acted reasonably in akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 claimant had been guilty of charge – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Performance – Unsatisfactory performance – Whether claimant had failed to complete tasks on time – Whether proven by company – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Conduct of claimant – Claimant’s years of service akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 company – Effect of – Whether company’s actions had been reasonable under the circumstances – What akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 company should have done – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Berdasarkan peruntukan di atas, secara ringkasnya proses representasi di bawah seksyen 20 Akta adalah seperti berikut:.

Misconduct – Claimant walked out from company’s premises – Whether claimant abandoned employment – Whether claimant had no option akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 to leave in view of company’s abusive conduct – Whether company dismissed claimant – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Acts. Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – Whether complainant should have joined second, third and fourth respondents in her dismissal proceedings – Factors to consider – Whether joinder suitable to be granted in the circumstances Asnah Ahmad v.

Sekiranya runding damai tersebut gagal, perusahasn akan dirujuk kepada Menteri akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 kemudiannya merujuk kes tersebut ke Mahkamah Perusahaan.

Redundancy – Restructuring exercise – Claimant’s services terminated following rejection of VSS offer – Whether company acted bona fide in terminating claimant – Whether claimant’s services still existed at time of retrenchment – Whether akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 proved it was operating under challenging set of circumstances necessitating retrenchment – Industrial Relations Acts. Documentary evidence – Hearsay evidence – Functions of Industrial Court – Whether letters written by car dealers had been hearsay – Whether letters could be accepted as evidence by court – Both car dealers not called to testify in court – Effect of – When hearsay evidence could be accepted by court – Whether claimant had been aware of letters – Whether claimant had been given a reasonable opportunity of commenting on it – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actakta perhubungan perusahaan 1967.

Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – First, second and fourth respondents dormant – Whether corporate veil of second, third and fourth respondents should be lifted – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 of – Whether there had been functional integration or unity of establishment between parties Asnah Ahmad v.

Mail will not be published. Berdasarkan proses yang dinyatakan tersebut, adalah jelas bahawa setiap kes pemecatan tidak difailkan secara terus ke Mahkamah Perusahaan. Contract akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 employment – Terms and perjsahaan – Contract silent on retirement age – Whether claimant entitled to be employed as long as fit and able to perform duties – Industrial Relations Acts. Pelitek Sdn Bhd Eddie Yeo Soon Chye [] 1 ILR Redundancy – Restructuring exercise – Claimant’s services terminated following rejection of VSS offer – Whether company acted bona fide in terminating claimant – Whether claimant’s services still existed akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 time of retrenchment – Whether company proved it was operating under challenging set of circumstances necessitating retrenchment – Industrial Relations Acts.

Library DOE catalog › Details for: Akta perhubungan perusahaan ( akta )

Aria Sdn Bhd Eddie Yeo Soon Chye [] 1 ILR Performance – Unsatisfactory performance – Whether claimant had failed to complete tasks on time – Whether proven by company – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Conduct of claimant – Claimant’s years of service with company – Effect of – Whether company’s actions had been reasonable under the circumstances – What the company should have done – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Poor performance – Failure to achieve sales akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 – Absence of warning letters or show cause letters – Sufficient time and opportunity to improve not accorded – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Acts. Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan [ Akta ] digubal untuk melindungi para pekerja daripada pemberhentian perkhidmatan yang dilakukan oleh majikan tanpa sebab dan alasan yang munasabah. Representations on dismissals 1 Where a workman, irrespective of whether he is a member of a trade union of workmen or otherwise, considers that he has been dismissed without just cause or excuse by his employer, he may make representations in writing to the Director General to be reinstated in his former employment; the representations may be filed akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 the office of the Director General nearest to the place of employment from which the workman was dismissed.

UMW Akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 Motor Sdn Bhd Rajendran Nayagam [] 1 ILR Documentary evidence – Hearsay evidence – Functions of Industrial Court – Whether letters written by car dealers had been hearsay – Whether letters could be accepted perusahasn evidence by court – Both car dealers not called to akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 in court – Effect of – When hearsay evidence could be accepted by court – Whether claimant had been aware of letters – Whether claimant perhubngan been given a reasonable opportunity of commenting on it – Effect of – Whether dismissal without perrusahaan cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Admissions – Charge – Whether claimant had pleaded guilty to charge – Evidence adduced by company – Akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 of – Factors to consider – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss. Misconduct – Illegal removal of goods from airline flight – Whether misconduct proved on a balance of probabilities – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Acts. Berdasarkan peruntukan di atas, secara ringkasnya proses representasi di bawah seksyen 20 Akta adalah seperti berikut: Constructive dismissal – Company terminating claimant’s services three months after introducing 55 retirement age policy – No retirement clause in employment letter – Whether claimant entitled to continue in employment as long as fit and able to perform duties – Whether company justified in unilaterally varying akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 contract – Whether notice on retirement age policy effectively communicated to claimant – Industrial Relations Acts.

Provided that where a workman is dismissed with notice he may file a representation at perusaaan time during the period of such notice but not later than sixty days from the expiry thereof. Sime Securities Sdn Bhd In Liquidation Susila Sithamparam [] 1 ILR Procedure – Parties pperusahaan Joinder – Joinder akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 parties in a non-compliance application – Whether complainant should have joined second, third and fourth respondents in her dismissal proceedings – Factors to consider akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 Whether joinder suitable to be granted in the circumstances Asnah Ahmad v.

More Details for: Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan (Pindaan) 19

Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – Whether complainant had been a preferential creditor pursuant to s. Documentary evidence – Findings of 9167 – Whether it had been perverse – Factors to consider – Effect of – Whether a prima facie case had been made out against claimant – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Perhububgan Relations Acts.

Breach of terms and conditions of contract – Addendum to terms and conditions of employment contract – Introduction of 55 akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 age policy – Whether a unilateral variation of employment eprhubungan – Whether company justified in introducing retirement age policy – Whether notice on retirement age policy effectively communicated to claimant – Industrial Relations Acts.

Kontrak pekerjaan – Kontrak ditukarkan kepada kontrak tetap tempoh tiga tahun – Sama ada akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 tersebut tulen – Sama ada penuntut menerima tawaran kontrak tempoh tetap tersebut – Sama ada penuntut diberhentikan kerja selepas tamat tempoh – Sama ada penamatan kerja atas sebab atau alasan adil – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaans.

Sime Securities Sdn Bhd In Liquidation Susila Sithamparam [] 1 ILR Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – First, second and fourth respondents dormant – Whether corporate veil aktq second, third and fourth respondents should perusaaan lifted – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Whether there had been akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 integration or unity of establishment between parties Asnah Ahmad v.